US 101 Analysis

Support litigation and licensing with 101-based risk assessment.

US 101 Analysis

A US 101 Analysis is a critical assessment that evaluates a patent’s validity and strength under the complex rules of Section 101 of U.S. patent law. In today’s challenging legal landscape, especially for software, AI, and business method patents, even granted patents can be vulnerable to invalidation for being directed to an “abstract idea.” This analysis provides a vital, proactive stress test to determine how well a patent would stand up against this common and powerful challenge.
At Signicent, we provide a rigorous and objective US 101 Analysis to arm your legal and business teams with strategic foresight. Our team of technical experts and patent analysts dissects the patent claims in light of the latest court decisions and USPTO guidance. We deliver a detailed risk profile that empowers you to build stronger litigation strategies, accurately value patent portfolios, and negotiate licensing deals from a position of informed strength.
Why

Why Conduct a US 101
Analysis?

Proactively understand the strength and potential vulnerabilities of your key patents.
Fortify your position in litigation by anticipating and preparing for a 101 invalidity challenge.
Make smarter, data-driven decisions in high-stakes licensing and acquisition negotiations.
Avoid wasting resources enforcing or acquiring patents with a high risk of invalidation.

Why Choose Signicent for
this Service?

Our team blends deep technical expertise with a thorough understanding of evolving 101 case law.

We provide a clear, evidence-based risk score, not just a high-level legal summary.

Our objective, third-party analysis provides credible, unbiased support for your legal strategy.

We have extensive experience analyzing complex patents in software, AI, and fintech.

Our Analysis Delivers a Clear
Assessment Of

The patent’s overall risk profile and vulnerability based on current legal precedents.
Specific patent claims and elements that are susceptible to an “abstract idea” challenge.
Potential arguments, case law, and evidence to defend the patent’s eligibility.
A strategic recommendation on the patent’s strength for litigation or licensing.
Scroll to Top